On 8/17/05, Chen Xiao Fan wrote: > Sorry there is a missing word there. ICD2 does not really > work with *Linux* now even though there is a program called LPLAB > which is close to work. Without Microchip's source code to ICD2, > it is not so easy. Just take note this post was sent to the > GNUPIC list and most of the discussions there are for Linux. > > PICkit 1 and PICkit 2 are differnt, the source code is available to > PICkit 1. The source code to PICkit 2 will soon be released and the > protocol is similar to PICkit 1. > > Reagrds, > Xiaofan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sean Schouten" > Newsgroups: gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.pic > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 7:12 PM > Subject: Re: [PIC] recomended PICs for hobbyists > > >> ICD2 may be for those who want to work with dsPICs but the > >> problem is that it does not support right now. Let me draw you the entire picture. Hobbyists and Beginers are not living only in the USA. Hobbysts are humans usually with long beards. Begginers are young humans with long ears believing everything which fly is good for eating. The most recommende PIC for those two categories is the PIC they can found in the store from the neighborhood. ICD2 is not included in this category. PICkit 1 ot 2 also. Homebrew boards yes. cheers, Vasile > > > > > > ICD2 does not support dsPIC? How can it not support dsPIC? Are you > > reffering to the not-so-functional clones? > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist