John Nall wrote:
> So for a single user system, such as a PIC, a very elementary
> operating system would not be a difficult thing to write.
	:
> Once this was accomplished, then I think that a C-like
> language would be a lot more feasible.
>
Wow.  You're obviously coming at things from an entirely different
direction than I was thinking.  I don't see how an operating system
would have ANY bearing on the C vs Harvard architecture issues that
most of us seem to be talking about.  I've always found that C *is*
pretty OS-independent.  Of course, there seem to be an increasing
number of people who want to equate C with posix - are you one
of those?

(darn tag keep dissappearing.  Perhaps at Olin's...  We did decide
on "EE", right?)

BillW
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist