I have seen several references to an ICD2 clone, and think that I might 
try and build one.  But googling "ICD2 clone" appears to indicate that 
there have been several such devices produced by various and sundry 
people.  Which is good, of course, and I feel sure that each and every 
person who did the development feels that his (or hers) is the "best."  
But is there a concensus among this group, which I consider the most 
authoritative, as to which would win the competition?  Although several 
factors could go into it, I would consider the main criteria to be how 
solid and bug-free the result is.

Thanks for the help.

John
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist