> I also think IT stuff should be able to be inside EE
> (sorry to "contaminate" the EE tag, Russel) since EE
> can be interpreted as "Everything Engineering".

I agree with you :-).
And I think James intended usage does too.
We all win.
I'd like a [TECH] ([TECHO]?) tag but that seems to be too 
hard/undesirable/?.
Best of all would be a [RUSL] tag and then nobody would have problems 
with my posts :-)

> Proper tagging is important but I think "[PIC] Re:
> [OT]:Is C30 price set by Microchip???" is proper
> tagging.

I'm not sure how that *really* gets handled nowadays.
I can find posts that say how people THINK it gets handled, but they 
often disagree with each other. Some say it goes to only one tag group 
(the first?), some say it goes to all groups. If the latter then it's 
an excellent way to transition between groups as long as subsequent 
posters remove the old tag. Which they probably won't do.

Follow the "Widlar" threads and think about what hope we have of 
getting tags right :-)


        RM 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist