On Wednesday 03 August 2005 06:29 am, Olin Lathrop scribbled: > Probably. What width parameter did you use for it? Small width values can > make photoplotting (and generation of photoplotter files) take a long time. Default of 0.016". Just read a bit on polygons in the manual. Found out that spacing is only applicable to hatch patterns. > > Currently (over 2 hrs into the processing), > > Wow, that really is "long". Usually the whole process takes a few seconds. > The longest it ever took for me was on the QuickProto-01 board because it > had a sea of holes with a ground polygon around them. But that only took > maybe a minute or two on several of the arpetures, maybe 5-10 minutes > total. This board is a *bit* bigger at 162 sq in. But yes, I agree it is excessively long. > > ... I understand that an "aperture" is an individial > > element on the board. > > No. It is one of the various shapes use to draw with. Gerber plotting is > really a line drawing process with various shape and size "pens". Large > areas are drawn by going over them in a raster pattern, just like you would > if you were trying to fill in an area with a real pen. Of course the finer > the pen tip, the longer this takes. > > Photoplotters draw with light onto film, hence the "pens" are apertures > that result in a beam of specific size and shape. In the old days, there > were a few standard apertures on an aperture wheel that had fixed holes > pre-punched into it. Now the equipment can do variable aperture on the > fly. Interesting. Never knew this. I just got a chance to experiment with this a bit... no groundplane took about ~2 minutes. Groundplane with 0.016" width took ~6-7 hours. Groundplane with 0.05" width took ~4 minutes. Not a lot of datapoints, but enough to prove that was indeed the problem. I'll have to experiment with various settings next time. Thanks, -Neil. -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist