On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 11:39 +0100, Chris Emerson wrote:

> It's both.  Will you verify that the behaviour of gplink hasn't changed
> every time you upgrade it?

Yes...  It's easy to do....

> If it's your project, and you're happy to check, or never upgrade
> gplink, then there's no problem of course.
> 
> FWIW I think it's a good idea, but would feel uncomfortable relying on
> this kind of undocumented behaviour.  (I use gplink.)

I don't consider it to be undocumented... The behaviour is clear from
the source and there can be no more authoritative documentation than the
source code.  How often have you come across errors in manuals ?  

Peter

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist