On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:57:08AM +0100, Peter Onion wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 10:13 +0100, Michael Rigby-Jones wrote:
> 
> > But of course no guarantees that this behaviour won't change in the
> > future.  
> 
> It's not changing behaviour you guys have a problem with, it's unknown
> behaviour in the case of MPLINK.  That's your problem, not mine.

It's both.  Will you verify that the behaviour of gplink hasn't changed
every time you upgrade it?

If it's your project, and you're happy to check, or never upgrade
gplink, then there's no problem of course.

FWIW I think it's a good idea, but would feel uncomfortable relying on
this kind of undocumented behaviour.  (I use gplink.)

Chris
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist