>Alan B. Pearce wrote:
>>...
>I noticed some things you might want to look into:
...
>I've got a nicer way of handling this since you grabbed the
>snapshot this code was based on.  See the new DEFRAM macro.

Yeah, this is pretty old code now, from your original release, that I
managed to persuade you to send me.

>>        dbank   intr_led_reg
>>        bcf     intr_led_pin    ; show serial activity LED
>
>I assume you are using DBANK only since this is intended ...

>This is a problem since the LED code stomped on the bank. ...

You picked up a couple of errors I did not spot because they never gave me
trouble. Problem with posting ones old code as examples to others. (red face
VBG)

>Why DBANK and not DBANKIF?

Cannot remember. (more red face)

>>        nop                     ; nop for ICD to stop on
>
>Yeah, I wish the ICD didn't have that problem either.
>However, I've been surrounding these NOPs with IF DEBUG.
>I can set one symbol in the main include file to include
>or remove the ICD2 debug NOPs.

I know I did that elsewhere in the project. I also provided labels at
strategic points that I could use to set breakpoints. I do get the feeling
that they could have made the debug interface somewhat nicer without taking
up too much more real estate on the silicon.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist