> OK, fine.
> I prefer to follow the definitions set up by MC, that
> makes it much easier to read (e.g.) the link-card

OK, fine. ;-) The 16F628A is now nW because MC says it is

> > Some "nW" parts have fewer 
> peripherals than the 12F675.
> 
> So what ?

> "nW" is about core/osc features, not peripherials. "nW" doesn't
> imply that the part has some specific peripherial(s), does it ?

I don't know - it's not me claiming that peripherals make a nW
part nW. I've only ever mentioned what current the device actually
uses. Which, in the end, is all I care about. MC can call it whatever
the heck they like


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist