> While there is nothing at all wrong with the Wisp628, I'd say, that if
> you AREN'T on a bare bones budget an ICD2 is a must have. Once you go
> ICD, you never go back...

I am of course not unbiased, but I have a PS+, ICD2 and Wisp628 on my
desk. I use the Wisp628 for almost everything, because I can include the
programming step in my compile/link/program scripts. That is not a
feature of the ICD2 programming hardware, but of the PC software. 

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist