Wouter van Ooijen wrote:

> Exactly. When the PIC was first designed the 300 factor was probably a
> fact (OK, maybe it was just a factor 2). But right now alternatives do
> exist, so why are you using PICs 

I'm not sure that was targeted to me... but I answer it anyway :)

Why I'm using them has not really a simple answer. One is that I know them,
that they provide for me a reasonable cost/benefit relation (where I use
them), another may be that they are within a customer's preference for a
number of reasons -- and that's not all yet.

As I said, I never had a problem with paging. I let the compiler take care
of it. For me, that's not a reason not to use a PIC.

> and/or are you on the PIClist? 

Because of the interesting discussions about contentious subjects :)

Gerhard
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist