Whatever solution you use, may be best to implement it for both ways.   Else
you will have the same problem the other way if faster device is on other
end.

Bill

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "William Chops Westfield" <westfw@mac.com>
To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist@mit.edu>
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Is 632 a "magic number" for PICs ?


> On Jun 17, 2005, at 5:47 PM, Roy J. Gromlich - PA wrote:
>
> > So now I need to come up with a rational way to pause
> > the data coming into the PCB...
>
> Can you simply set the PC to generate 2 stop bits, while configuring
> the PIC and MAX to only need one?  That should be plenty of pause,
> and doesn't require any handshaking or SW modifications on either side.
>
> BillW
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist