At 05:39 PM 6/14/2005, Walter Banks wrote:
>This isn't a value judgment but it is entirely possible that James 
>first description
>has an economic advantage to everyone even when accounting for the apparent
>economic loss from the second group.
>
>Take all the features that everyone wants and build a device that 
>supports them
>charge each customer for the features they want. Integrate the costs and the
>revenue generated and compare the integration of costs and revenue generated
>from several different products for several different customer types. Reliably
>should be up and and customer costs costs should be down. Nash won a
>Nobel prize for just this type of economic thinking.

I've seen and read beautiful mind, but I would like to know more 
about nash's work.
Also, my wife has the same problem, though not usually to that degree.
Makes life interesting.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist