Peter Onion wrote:
> Ok, I'm going to stick my neck out a bit here, but I believe gpasm's
> developers aim is to make it be as compatible as possible with MPASM.
> I've only ever used gpasm and I've never come across any code on the
> web
> that gpasm won't assemble, and while gpasm may have features missing I
> don't think it has any extras that would make valid gpasm code fail to
> work on MPASM.

Does MPASM support the <name>: code label syntax?  I hadn't seen that before
in MPASM source.  For a long time, Microchip had a bunch of secret features
in MPASM that wasn't in the MPASM manual.  I think they were listed in the
MPLAB help, but of course you'd have to know to ask to get them.  Is this
possibly one of them, or is it an outright incompatibility in GPASM?


*****************************************************************
Embed Inc, embedded system specialists in Littleton Massachusetts
(978) 742-9014, http://www.embedinc.com
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist