> But changing EE to Everything Engineering seems like a perfect and
> practical solution to me.

Why not put them in PIC and noise that up, instead of noising up EE ?
Seems like a perfect and practical solution to me.
Not.
Of course.

Your solution is neither perfect or even especially practical. I fail 
to see what you gain by it and I fail to see what's wrong with another 
tag that suits technology.

It would make more sense to, almost equally arbitrarily, move the TECH 
material into the very little used AVR tag or, more logically,  delete 
AVR and replace it with TECH, if the number of tags is an issue, and 
move AVR subjects into either PIC or EE. That would make more sense 
than mixing ballistas, bolometers, electrocardiograms, epidemics, 
weston cells, western blotting, galvanometers, gallup polls, 
densitomers, dulcimers and more.

> And I do support the policy that politics and religion should not be 
> on
> the list, not even as OT or WOT.

That, of course, is standard policy, and has been since time 
immemorial, along with sex (doesn't stop James violently breaking his 
own prohibition)(lie to me that it aint so :-) ), racism, rudeness and 
a few others. I don't think there has been any well canvassed 
suggestion that this should change. Maybe the odd well meaning remark 
made by people who are not fully aware of the scope of OT.



        RM

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist