>> At risk of getting my head shot off, i must say I don't have a problem
>> with contentious political stuff under OT.
>
>It doesn't bug me either. But a couple have voiced dissent.
>
>I think the dissent is valid. Especially Olin's point that he subscribes
>to OT specifically to pick up OT electronics posts and Bob's point that
>the digest contains everything.

Quite frankly I cannot understand why any electronics would end up in OT,
unless it was historical stuff about Tesla coils or some such. Anything of
current electronics interest, but not specifically PIC I expect to see under
EE. I don't see a need to change it to TECH, or to add a TECH tag. The list
is primarily about PICs, and an adjunct of that is any other electronics,
with anything else being OT. Rather than try and make the PICList into an
"everything goes" list, do remember that we are hosted at no cost on an
academic system, and should try and slow down the traffic somewhat. I cannot
remember the most recently quoted traffic figures, but they were into the
gigabytes/day as I recall.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist