Why not just start using it? After all many of the postings add a colon such as [OT:] or [OT]: which causes some replies to wind-up untagged. I have my email client set to move all untagged replies to a separate folder, where I can try to figure out where they actually belong.

KF4HAZ - Lonnie

----- From: "Russell McMahon" <apptech@
Subject: Re: [OT] Too OT?


> >... may I second, vote and pass the motion that [WOT] be added as an 
> >acceptable tag.
> 
> No. No way.
> But, regardless, I third your motion and amend it and second and pass 
> the amendment that we also add TECH aswell.
> All those in favour say "aye"
> All James's against say "naye".
> The nayes have it.
> 
> 
> 
>         RM 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist