Dave VanHorn wrote:

>>> Interesting opportunity for their competition though, to have a look at
>>> "raw" output and what Max's yield rates are, if they are truly
>>> untested parts, which seems doubtful.
>>
>>Not really an interesting opportunity... probably doesn't make much sense
>>to compare your competitor's marketing noise with your statistical figures.
> 
> I meant by actually getting some of the raw output.

Oh, I missed that... but then there's the big "if" you noted. So probably
not even there an opportunity. It seems the only opportunity this presented
was to have a peek at Maxim's marketing strategies in an unusual situation
-- and to get some directed help from competitors regarding compatible
replacements :)

Gerhard
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist