At 02:00 PM 5/26/2005, Dave Turner wrote:
>Well, I'm not sure if it's because we're doing an entirely different
>think, but his pwm function is 105 lines.  Mine is 26.  Here is mine
>so far (the part I asked this question about goes after the on and off
>instructions, replacing the porta,0:

Actually, if you look at Scott's code, you will find within the comments at 
the start of the code the following:
;RAM:
; pwm0-pwm7 - pwm counters
; rising_edge - rising edge counter
; pwm_state - current state of the pwm outputs.
;ROM
; 38 instructions
;Execution time
; 23 cycles

In other words, Scott's routine uses 23 cycles to generate 8 separately 
adjustable PWM outputs.  That would make it about 5 times faster than your 
method.

Nothing wrong with the way you are approaching the problem.  Scott's method 
is different and faster.

dwayne

-- 
Dwayne Reid   <dwayner@planet.eon.net>
Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd    Edmonton, AB, CANADA
(780) 489-3199 voice          (780) 487-6397 fax

Celebrating 21 years of Engineering Innovation (1984 - 2005)
  .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-.   .-
     `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'   `-'
Do NOT send unsolicited commercial email to this email address.
This message neither grants consent to receive unsolicited
commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial email.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist