Hey guys,

First, RE: the first macro, with very many rrfs, no problem about tha
small screw-ups - managed to fix them in about 10 secs.

Second, now I realize that the expanded loops are the same speed as
loops, I still prefer to use loops - it gives tidyer, cleaner code. 
Also, it's very easy to add more pins.

Another thing, I figured in PWM the whole point is to get the timing
accurate, hence why it is important for the on and off code to be
symetrical.

Also, I will try Bob's idea of getting all the bits ready, and then
moving them into the port.  This should further help to get even
fading.

Also RE Bob, if the the code not being iosync is a problem, it should
be easy to pad it out with NOPs.


-- 

Dave
All us base are belong to you.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist