On 5/25/05, Bob Ammerman wrote: > - Instructions were not executed sequentially. Rather each instruction > contained the address of the next instruction to be executed. In effect, > each instruction was a 'jump' instruction as well as its ordinary function. > > - By carefully placing instructions around the drum you could time things so > that the next instruction would be under the read head just as the previous > instruction finished executing. > > - Eventually some smart programmer realized that the computer itself could > do the job of optimizing the placement of instructions and so was born SOAP, > the Symbolic Optimal Assembly Program. > > - However, some 'real programmers' wouldn't use SOAP because they felt they > could do a better job hand-optimizing the code. ObStoryOfMel: http://www.drbbs.com/jsw/jargon/jargon_49.html Bradley -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist