Two things. First :   'True' Science is far, far older than the
(unimportant IMO)doctrines of Karl Popper.


        Second, adding to what Wouter says :

>Popperian scientist can say...
[snip]

>Religious people can say 
[snip]

>IMHO neither group can say more, and if they would refrain from claiming
more they would
>never have to disagree on scientific/religious matters because the
intersection of the two is empty



        Deism can be called the 'intersection' of Science and Religion. For
instance, 

        "The Age Of Reason"
        http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/thomas_paine/age_of_reaso
n/part1.html


        I was expecting some American to say something about it since a good
deal of the founding fathers were Deists.



Best.
Juan.









-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist