On Fri, 20 May 2005, Russell McMahon wrote:

> The sad / funny / bizarre thing is that this man is hawking religion to 
> combat religion and doesn't even know it. He thinks he's hawking science but, 
> alas, doesn't properly know what science is. Or, he does know, but is happy 
> that non-Popper Science is OK as a foundation from which to teach children 
> "real science". Very sad.

Religion is a *belief* in the fallacity of science to explain it. 
Science is a *belief* in the fallacity of $DEITY to explain it. You tell 
me which is wrong.

Peter
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist