> Evolution falls outside Popper's boundaries and can not be 
> handled by Science as he knows it. It can of course be 
> handled by religion of whatever shape and form one wishes to 
> create to defend it and explain it. Puddles of primordial 
> goop or young earth divine Creator are equally good religious 
> views as a starting point. One or the other is more likely to 
> correspond to what really happened, but that's not the point.


Eh? So you don't feel that the breeding of animals or plants to produce new
strains, behaviors, traits, is evolution on the short term?

How exactly is it that we are NOT able to see the effects of evolution and
test the hypothesis to prove or disprove it? I thought that we had pretty
much tested it to death.

---
James.
 


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist