----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wouter van Ooijen" <wouter@voti.nl>
To: "'Microcontroller discussion list - Public.'" <piclist@mit.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 7:43 PM
Subject: RE: [PIC] Error % charts of PIC USART ?


> > right, good point, my guess is that the pc will have a clock
> > which is a multiple of the baud rate so that, as others have
> > said, with such a crystal there will be no error. 
> 
> Are willing to bet your neck on this? If not you'd better assume that
> the PC designer and you make the same assumptions, so each side can
> claim half of the error budget (that is, what's left of it after the
> transceivers, cable effects etc. have taken their part).

Well, obviously I will start with low error values, then see how
far I can push my luck ...

> 
> Wouter van Ooijen
> 
> -- -------------------------------------------
> Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
> consultancy, development, PICmicro products
> docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
>  
> 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.9 - Release Date: 12/05/2005
> 
> 
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist