"James Newtons Massmind" writes:
>The In-Reply-To: is much too unreliable. Quite often it is removed,
>incorrect, or just never inserted in the first place.

	I use nmh which is an old but very powerful UNIX user agent.
I can either put the In-Reply-To: header in as it is here or leave it
out by modifying the reply composition filter file.  The reason I have
always left it out was because I don't like to put any more headers in
replies than absolutely necessary.  I am sure many people hate to see
messages with tons of headers and 1 little line at the bottom of
actual informational content.  So, if it is of little value, I will
leave it out as I mostly always have.  What are the thoughts by those
who hopefully know more than I do about this topic?

Martin McCormick WB5AGZ  Stillwater, OK 
OSU Information Technology Division Network Operations Group
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist