http://www.finitesite.com/d3jsys/README-NPCI.html
NPCI... It came to me in a dream last night... <GRIN> Pretty sad when you
dream about unfinished PIC languages...

---
James.
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu 
> [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of James Newtons Massmind
> Sent: 2005 May 06, Fri 16:54
> To: 'Microcontroller discussion list - Public.'
> Subject: RE: [PIC:] XPL0 language
> 
> There is an SX port of I2L (the byte code interpreter for 
> XPL0) on sxlist.com under languages.
> 
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/languages.htm has a 
> heading for byte code interpreters with a couple entries. It 
> seems to be missing err...
> That language that BAJ never finished... What was it called? 
> 
> I have a pet idea for a language at
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist/cump/bytecode.htm
> 
> ---
> James.
>  
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu
> > [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of William Chops 
> Westfield
> > Sent: 2005 May 06, Fri 16:09
> > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
> > Subject: [PIC:] XPL0 language
> > 
> > Speaking of programming languages, the the techref page 
> mentions XPL0 
> > as a potentially useful language for PICs, but I no longer see any 
> > references to any microcontrollers on the relevant 
> homepage, and the 
> > 'direction' they seem to be taking is decidedly non-micro :-(
> > 
> > Is XPL0 for PICs (and etc) dead, or is there a new page somewhere 
> > where microcontroller interpreters and libraries are hiding?
> > 
> > (it seems to me that for beginners, especially, the libraries and 
> > support functions provided by a language/environment are a lot more 
> > important than the semantic details of the language itself.  This 
> > explains BASIC.
> > Assembler by definition doesn't come with any libraries, 
> but there's 
> > lots of sample code.  C didn't catch on until the libraries started 
> > becoming more consistent across platforms.
> > Non-standard languages like JAL or Parallax basic succeed 
> largely on 
> > the strength of built-in or already-implemented
> > functions...)
> > 
> > Are there any other "generic" bytecode interpreters out there?
> > 
> > BillW
> > --
> > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your 
> > membership options at 
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 
> 


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist