Don't use both _OSC_HS_1H and _OSC_HSPLL_1H

Just use: _OSC_HSPLL_1H

Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marcel Duchamp" <marcel.duchamp@sbcglobal.net>
To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist@mit.edu>
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [PIC] hspll mode not assembling correctly


> Marcel Duchamp wrote:
> As mentioned before, the config
>> value in my program listing is 0xf2; it should be 0xf6.  Again, my 
>> question is why is the assembler generating 0xf2?
>> MD
>> 
> 
> Further investigation has found that the correct code is assembled if 
> this line is used:
> 
> __CONFIG 300001, 0x00f6
> 
> instead of this:
> 
> __CONFIG _CONFIG1H, _OSC_HS_1H & _OSC_HSPLL_1H
> 
> The pll does turn on and the expected 10mip performance does happen. I 
> still do not understand why the usual config statements are not 
> assembling correctly... and yes, I have this at the top:
> 
> LIST P=18F4620 ;directive to define processor
> #include <P18F4620.INC> ;processor specific variable definitions
> 
> ???
> MD
> 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist