Marcel Duchamp wrote:
As mentioned before, the config
> value in my program listing is 0xf2; it should be 0xf6.  Again, my 
> question is why is the assembler generating 0xf2?
> MD
> 

Further investigation has found that the correct code is assembled if 
this line is used:

	__CONFIG 300001, 0x00f6

instead of this:

	__CONFIG _CONFIG1H, _OSC_HS_1H & _OSC_HSPLL_1H

The pll does turn on and the expected 10mip performance does happen. I 
still do not understand why the usual config statements are not 
assembling correctly... and yes, I have this at the top:

	LIST P=18F4620		;directive to define processor
	#include <P18F4620.INC>	;processor specific variable definitions

???
MD

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist