> James Newton, Host wrote:
> > Is anyone sending these new librarys to Eagle so they can 
> update the 
> > apparently poor librarys they have publically available?
> 
> After I spend some care making a part that should have been 
> made properly by CadSoft in the first place, I guess I don't 
> feel too much like rewarding them for it.

Well, I understand how you feel and I agree that CadSoft should pull its
head out and fix their libraries, but it isn't about helping CadSoft. It's
about helping the people who use CadSoft. Yes, that would indirectly help
CadSoft. 

But, for example, if someone took the time to make a complete library that
was well done and correct, then posted it on a web page with a note
detailing the failings of the CadSoft default libraries and how these
libraries fix those problems, CadSoft would be... Chastised, I guess is the
right word, and might eventually come knocking. That would fix the problem
and perhaps even some money could be charged as a further... Discipline
(?)... For the company.

Good work that is used by only one person is a waste. I.e. "a bells not a
bell till you ring it" and all that rot...

---
James Newton: PICList webmaster/Admin
mailto:jamesnewton@piclist.com  1-619-652-0593 phone
http://www.piclist.com/member/JMN-EFP-786
PIC/PICList FAQ: http://www.piclist.com



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist