It is a bit frustrating for those of us who are a bit new to the=20
architecture if that's the case... I wasn't sure if the code was wrong or i=
f=20
I had a huge misconception. Seems to me like this kind of stuff should be=
=20
revised and/or added to the errata, well it's good to know how reliable=20
these sheets can be, thanks for confirming my sanity.

btw, I did get my project working using the changes I mentioned.

~Jake B
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist