Also, Here is the cached data sheet for the MPF103: http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:D5LzPiH5pHIJ:www.americanmicrosemi.com/ products/specs/MPF103.phtml+mpf103&hl=en&lr=&strip=1 Carey > -----Original Message----- > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu]On Behalf > Of Michael Hagen > Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 10:56 PM > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > Subject: Re: [EE] MPF102=MPF103?? > > > I never have seen a "103" I have been around since the > begining of time > (built ham radio with tubes in the 60's), I bet it is a 102! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "csb" > To: > Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 7:20 PM > Subject: [EE] MPF102=MPF103?? > > > > Hello, > > > > Does anyone know if an MPF103 can 'replace' an MPF102? FET > > I'm looking at a few ham circuits, and the 102 is very common. > > I have none in my parts box, but I do have some MPF103s. The > > problem is I haven't been able to locate a datasheet for the > > 103, so I can't really compare them. Even though there's only > > 1 digit difference, what I have here might not even be a FET! > > > > I tried the usual sites to find cross-ref data or datasheets, > > but I've had 0 success. > > > > Thanks for help, > > Christian > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.2 - Release Date: 4/21/2005 > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist