At 08.24 2005.04.21 -0700, you wrote: > >--- ThePicMan wrote: >> >> [ oooops.. forgot the tag, resending, sorry.. ] >> >> >> Hellos, >> >> I have a big FIFO chip covered by dust, that I'd like to finally use. >> The most useful application I'm imagining for it is to finally make >> myself a logic analyzer. This FIFO (Texas Instruments SN74V3690-6PEU) >> is a 3.3V device, but has 5V tolerant inputs. "Great!" I thought. >> >> What I'm asking you is: should I connect the probes (just a header >> cable) directly to the FIFO, or should I use an high speed buffer >> inbetween? Consider that the chip is specced at 166MHz. >> >> Moreover, what is the cheapest way to produce a variable clock >> speed up to 166MHz (and possibly beyond, for other applications)? >> A PLL? Any chip you may suggest me? >> >> Thanks! >> TPM >> -- >> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >> View/change your membership options at >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist >> > >Try Maxim ic ecooscilators >Here is a URL to click on for quick access >http://para.maxim-ic.com/compare.asp?Fam=EconOsc&Tree=&HP=&ln=&SORD=1311&FT_ >1311=14999&ITEMLIST=12F76,12F77,12F78,12F79,12F7A,12F7B,12F7C,12F7D,12F7E,12 >F7F,12F80,12F81,12F82,12F83,12F84,12F85,12F86,12F87,12F8B,12F8C,12F8D,12F8E, >12F92,12F95 None of these reach 166 MHz.. > > >Stephen R. Phillips was here >Please be advised what was said may be absolutely wrong, and hereby this >disclaimer follows. I reserve the right to be wrong and admit it in front >of the entire world. > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com >-- >http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >View/change your membership options at >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist