At 19.41 2005.04.13 +0100, you wrote:
>> In the end we all benefit by knowing that any application running on a
>> dsPIC is guaranteed to be advanced or "cool".  Think about it.  Do you
>> really want an invasion of unwashed newbies asking questions about how to
>> blink an LED on a dsPIC?  Geesh, talk about pearls before swine!
>
>I laughed so hard on this one.... i never laughed this hard for any other 
>piclist post before!!!

Sure, although the OP must have felt very insulted by Olin's sarchastic reply
when it is Olin that failed to understand what the OP meant.

At least I know I'm not alone in my interpretation that the OP meant that
the dsPIC perhaps needed extra parts (RAM, ROM, etc..), as most++ other DSP's.

I wouldn't be surprised if he now thinks that the PICLIST is a place full of
unfriendly presumptuos people.. and leaves. One more on Olin's (long) record.

Do you still laugh out loud?

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist