>> Nobody has used the word "erotica". Erotica is pornography by 
>> another
>> name. Ignoring, for a moment, any concept of whether pornography is
>> good or bad or whatever makes it far easier to decide what 
>> constitutes
>> pornography.

> "Erotica" is on a woman's bookshelf.  "Porn" is the same material, 
> under
> a 16-year-old boy's mattress.

Possibly.
Leave the women viewers out of it for the moment. We are going to have 
enough trouble tying the men down :-)

>> It's OBVIOUS that many of these women are
>> involved in the sex industry in one way or the other - pornography 
>> or
>> prostitution or whatever. A surprising statement? Not one I'm
>> (probably) going to justify, but if you don't agree that it's 
>> obvious
>> then you've been looking at too much porn yourself :-).

> While I myself have not investigated domai.com, I suspect you may be
> objecting to certain "enhancements" that some of the women there
> (probably) possess.

No. Augmentations fall well within the range of normal, even in NZ :-)

I'm not going to do a blow by blow response to each such query but I 
suggest, if such sites do not offend you per se, that you have a quick 
look at the site (not just the fully misleading front page) and see if 
you can spot what I mean. (Have your wife accompany your viewing and 
see what she thinks!). I'll stick with "obvious" for now. By all means 
someone disabuse me if you think I way off beam, but offlist please.

James - what did Maria think of the site?
(One day REAL soon I'm going to push my luck too far ;-) ).



        Russell McMahon

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist