On Apr 11, 2005, at 12:54 AM, Russell McMahon wrote: > >> Not porno by my definition that I am aware of but ... >> > > Had a look at the front page. > Yep. That's porn. I dunno. By most definitions, I thought mere nudity didn't qualify as porn; that doesn't mean it's acceptable to everyone, or in good taste, of course. Just not "pornography." BillW -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist