Must have happened recently. I lived in Japan for several years in the 50's and 60's. My parents were never concerned about a female being attacked. It just didn't happen. Thanks for the enlightenment. Actually, the porn sites themselves don't bother me, but the porn SPAM does. --Bob Russell McMahon wrote: >> I wonder if porn is, in truth, that bad. >> >> In Japan, porn is very open. People are squeezed together on a >> commuter train, yet several >> people are reading little pamphlets of the grossest porn imaginable, >> yet Japan's yearly sex >> crimes can be easily counted on one hand. No scientific study has >> ever shown a relationship >> between porn and sex crimes. > > > The assertion re japan's sex crime rate doers not seem to be born out > by available data. While the Japanese sex crime rate is low per capita > compared to many countries, it's not as idyllic as you suggest. With > 1500 odd rapes a year (let alone other sex crimes) you'd need a very > large single large hand to count them on. > > *** Interesting report *** > > > http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/online_artcls/pornography/prngrphy_rape_jp.html > > > Pornography, Rape and Sex Crimes in Japan > International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 22(1): 1-22. 1999 > Milton Diamond University of Hawai'i - Manoa etc > Ayako Uchiyama National Research Institute of Police Science Tokyo > 102, JAPAN > > This report also suggests that in Japan at least, and specifically, > there IS a correlation between sex crimes and pornography. > > It has also been suggested that the Japanese tend to ignore certain > classes of sex crimes which would be reported elsewhere - including > some wghich would be abhorrent to many western countries > > Pornography research site with a view to demnstrating that porn usage > reduces sex crimes - > Site liable to be offensive to some (some portions of it wouuld be > offensive to me :-) ). > > http://solomonsrefuge.com/PornStudies.htm > > ___________ > > Ignoring Japan for the moment, I find that last assertion interesting. > I was under the impression that a causal relationship had been > formally established BUT I have no references for that. I would > suspect any pornographer who took that as a hard and fast position or > also being a tobacco company executive in their spare time (and > probably used to be on the Enron board). > > I find it extremely hard to imagine that there is not a relationship > (LBJ's investigation notwithstanding.(Hey, hey, LBJ ... :-( ). .You > could argue that there is correlation without necessarily being > causation. ie it seems probable to me that the overwhelming majority > of sex criminals (whatever that means) are also users of pornography > but that does not per se establish a cause and effect relationship. I > would be surprised if there were many sex criminals who did not use > pornography. The general rule is that activities that target the > brains pleasure responses tend to "saturate" with use and both demand > greater and greater stimulus levels to achieve the same level of > "pleasure" and drive the user to maintain the pleasure levels. Once > hooked on sex related activities it'srobable that all available > affordable resources will be utilised. > > In the case of pornography, what (extremely) little I have come across > of harder core porn over the years has been to me quite sickening and > grotesque. This is not just a puritan knee-jerk morality reaction > (although I suppose there's some of that lurking in there somewhere as > well :-) ) but a genuine surprise at the strange things that people > find attractive once they have worked their way through the more > normal fare. As a (within the range of) normal male I am programmed > much the same as most other men. How and when one runs the program and > with what parameters can affect outcomes quite substantially. I'm sure > that people who now pursue what is to me bizarre and perverse forms of > sexual material started off with perspectives not too unlike my own. > > It would be interesting to know what was constituted "proof" of a > causal link between sex crimes and pornography. Unlike tobacco and > cancer where there are disease mechanisms which can be directly > analysed, in the case of P & SC we are dealing with the human mind and > proof is much more tenuous. However, any male who seriously questions > the link between the two is missing his calling as an engineer. > > > > Russell McMahon > -- Note: To protect our network, attachments must be sent to attach@engineer.cotse.net . 1-866-263-5745 USA/Canada http://beam.to/azengineer -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist