> I still don't understand what the problem is with this
> (artificial) limit of the address range of MOVFF. Why
> did you make a "note" about it at all ?

As Soon Lee has been asking questions about basic 18F
code I assumed, and it appears, he might not be aware of
MOVFF and other 16-bit instructions. I've no problem, and
AFAIK there is no problem, with the range of MOVFF, it is
what it is, and I simply pointed it out to him in passing

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist