Jinx wrote :

> > > Did I miss a class about an extended range MOVFF ?
> > 
> > OK. Now I'm lost here...
> > Why would you need that ?
> 
> Buggered if I know - why would one ask "In what way is
> the range 000-FFF "limited" ?" ? A defined range is a limit

Of course :-). But when you wrote :

>> (note that MOVFF has a limited
>> source - target address range of 000 to FFF)

*I* read that as it was something to watch out for or to
concider when using MOVFF (instead of other RAM
access methods).

I still don't understand what the problem is with this
(artificial) limit of the address range of MOVFF. Why
did you make a "note" about it at all ? English isn't
my first language, but I think that this "note" might lead
someone to think that there's a *real* problem...

Yes, this have probably lead to far now, but, still, since
I'm not concidering me to know the PIC's that well, I always
want to know when it look s like I've been misunderstanding
something.



Best Regards,
Jan-Erik.



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist