Agreed, at the $4 price point you might want to consider just keeping
it at home.

Another though since you're already hosting yourself, if your budget
allows is just get a bigger pipe, if that's an option...why give
someone else the extra cash when you can use it for more...


On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:16:57 -0500, Peter Johansson <peter@elemental.org> wrote:
> Russell McMahon writes:
> 
> > Looking for a well priced web presence to complement my large but
> > sloooooow (128 kbps pipe) home server capacity.
> >
> > Want (fairly basic)
> 
> There are a lot of players in the $4/mo web hosting arena these days,
> and it's a pretty brutal market.  I haven't heard anything
> specifically negative about any of the sites others have mentioned,
> but beware -- the service guarantees for all of them are pretty
> minimal.  If you are just running a personal or vanity site, it isn't
> worth sweating over.  But if you are running a commercial site where
> uptime and support are an issue, I'd reconsider any of these cheap
> hosters.
> 
> -p.
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 


-- 
-jmg

Chaos often breeds life, when order breeds habit.
Henry Brooks Adams [1838-1918]
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist