It seems to me that Olin's programmer are really good. Is this a EasyProg or a ProProg? Hope someone will come out with a table for ICD2 (USB interface), PicStart+, Promate II and Promate III. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Robertson [mailto:jimpl@newfoundelectronics.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:27 AM > To: piclist@mit.edu > Subject: [PIC:] prog time > > > > >Roland Jollivet Wrote: > >I'm using ICProg and a AN589 programmer. > >It takes 52s to program the 18F452 (all flash and data) > > > >So I'm wondering if that's reasonable. > > > Some time ago this was posted on the piclist. Don't know to > the day when as > I just saved the meat of it as a text file. The date of this > post is 05/02 > MM/YY > > > > Olins programer: > > > PIC Program time (sec) Verify time (sec) > > > ------- ------------------ ----------------- > > > 12F629 12.9 2.8 > > > 16F628 23.7 5.0 > > > 16F877 55.8 18.3 > > > 18F452 36.3 18.3 > > > 18F1320 18.0 8.6 > > > >Hah, some solid figures! Below are the figures for > Wisp628/XWisp on an > >XP 2 GHz, via an USB->serial converter. Rob Hamerling will > probably be > >able to provide figures that eliminate the XWisp and USB->serial > >aspects. > > > >I just read the chip, saved the file (code,data,fuses, full range of > >each) and timed the 'go' command for that file (= erase, > write, verify - > >at one Vcc - Wisp628 is a prototype programmer). > > > >PIC 'go' time (seconds) > >------- --- > >12F675 18 > >16F628 39 > >16F877 141 > >16F877A 67 > >18F452 135 > >18F1320 16 > > > >Now can anyone create such figures for a bit-banged (parallel port or > >serial port) programmer? And mybe time a PS+ too? > > > >Olin: comparing the figures your writing time for the 18F1320 seems > >high. > > > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist