I think the overhead of the PC host software should not be
underestimated. How long will it takes to program a PIC18452
normally? I think 52s is way too wrong.

Xiaofan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan-Erik Soderholm [mailto:jan-erik.soderholm@telia.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 4:17 PM
> To: piclist@mit.edu
> Subject: RE: [PIC:] prog time
> 
> 
> > I'm using ICProg and a AN589 programmer.
> > It takes 52s to program the 18F452 (all flash and data)
> > 
> > So I'm wondering if that's reasonable.
> > 
> > Can anyone say how long it takes using the ICD?
> > Also, does anyone use a free/cheap progger that allows just 
> > your program to burn, and not the entire flash?
> 
> Is there *any* programmer that doesn't limit the
> programming to the *used* memory ?
> Since ICProg seems to be a popular tool, it would
> surprice me a lot if it can't do that.
> 
> Personaly I'm using the Wisp628 (www.voti.nl/wisp628) and it it
> burns smaller apps in a fraction to a few seconds. Particulary
> when used with XWisp2 (from www.robh.nl) instead of the
> original XWisp...
> 
> Best Regards,
> Jan-Erik.
> 
> 
> 
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist