In the studies we did Basic Stamp was still larger than compiled C for any application that fit
inside a PIC's memory space when you included the interpreter for the same application.
The Basic stamp's one significant advantage was the ability to have external storage for
the application. The intermediate code in the stamp is about as tight as any of the
Interpreted code that we studied.

w..


Gerhard Fiedler wrote:

> Are there any real-world comparisons of overall code size (including the
> interpreter) between something like Basic Stamp and the same functionality
> implemented in C, Jal, XCSB or whatever compiled language?


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist