> Would JAL++ be OO?

Depends on your definition. I don't believe in virtual functions on the
type of microcontrollers Jal is targeting, so there won't be run-time
polymorphism.

> What kind of features would you like to implement in JAL++?

Better abstraction mechanisms, something like Ada parameterised modules
or C++ templates.

> Have you considered generating high level source

No, I think the compiler should have full control over what is
generated. I have been dreaming about a construct that I'd like at least
in theory be able to implement: fixed-timing programming. This
definitely requires full control over the generated code.

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist