If you want to "protect" pictures, then watermark them. > -----Original Message----- > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu > [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of Russell McMahon > Sent: 16 February 2005 10:09 > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > Subject: Re: [AD]: Project offer any one interested? > > > >No body is trying to take control of your browser I am > >>just trying to Protect pictures. > > > The number of times I have wanted to save a picture, only > to find the > > "save picture" is blocked, so I go probing in the cache to find it, > > and save from there, makes me very amused at this attitude. > > > As with most things, there is a way around it ... > > Best approach is probably to place copyright notices on one's > site and material (even if the Berne Copyright Convention > makes this technically unnecessary). If people copy the > photos for their private use one cannot tell and there is > relatively little harm done - and odds are that this does > constitute "fair use" which is explicitly allowed by law. If > however the pictures appear on the web or elsewhere without > permission this is in contravention of moral and legal rights > and action of one sort or another can be taken. If you cared > enough about it you could probably make things uncomfortable > for the thief, no matter how big or small they were. Whether > it is worth doing so is up to you. > > If you care enough, it is possible to easily save text or > other data within your actual pictures which prove that they > are yours. This does degrade image quality somewhat and may > not survive rescaling etc, depending on the method used. . > > > RM > > Copyright 2005 by > Russell McMahon > > > :-) > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist