Thanks Jason,

I hadn't changed the HID_RPT01_SIZE, I had wrongly assumed that it
calculated the size like the other definitions.

I am having trouble understanding the HID report, I found one that was
close enought and changed the bit I needed and I am working again, I
have read heaps on this but its not turning on the light yet...


regards

Lee McLaren.

Jason Harper wrote:

>Did you change the definition of HID_RPT01_SIZE to match the exact size
>of your report?  Microchip's sample code does NOT do this for you automatically!
>
>The 5th line of your report says "Vendor Usage 8" in the comment, but
>the actual hex code you have is 0x03.  I'm not sure what the exact
>effect of this might be.  Double-check the hex codes for your
>REPORT_SIZE & COUNT as well, they don't look right.  I believe usb.org
>has a utility that generates the hex codes for reports, however I
>haven't used it myself.
>
>There may be some problems caused by using Vendor Usage 1 for both your
>overall collection, and one of the items in your input/output.
>
>You have USAGE_MIN/MAXIMUM items at the end of the report that don't do
>anything, because they are not followed by an INPUT or OUTPUT spec that
>uses them.
>	Jason Harper
>  
>


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist