John J. McDonough wrote :

> Well, not only that, but if you do the one subroutine per 
> file thing, when you stuff it all in a library the linker will
> merrily pull out only the stuff you need.

Right, but the major problem with *object* code libraries is
that you lose all assembly-time calculations and conditionals
and so on. Olin's environment, as an example, would be quite
hard to move to a object LIB based build environment.

What I'd realy liked to see, is *source* code libraries where
the assembler would search, extract and include source code
"snippets" out of plain text libraries on-the-fly. Not having
to have everything in one large INC file.

B.t.w, how many are realy using object LIB's a lot in their
PIC projects ?

Jan-Erik.



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist