Wouter van Ooijen wrote :

> > But doesn't (in curcuit use of) dip-clips add the same
> > complexity (if any) as any other variant of ICSP ??
> > It's it just another, slightly different hardware solution, not ?
> 
> two different points:
> 1) your circuit must allow for ICSP (MCLR, RB6, RB7, etc)
> 2) the physical realisation must allow for connection of the 
> programmer
> A DIP clip makes 2) trivial (provided that you use a DIP 
> chip). I think the above OP talked about 2). Of course the
> 1) aspect remains.


Yep, that was what I was thinking about. I thought that 1) was
missing from the discussion, but I could have been clearer
about that in my former post... Sorry.

Jan-Erik.


> 
> Wouter van Ooijen
> 
> -- -------------------------------------------
> Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
> consultancy, development, PICmicro products
> docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
>  
> 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist