Take one part science, water down with ten parts entertainment.

While the show is not scientifically rigorous it does tend to do what it 
claims - bust myths.  They don't need to do it in a quantifiable manner 
to get another season, they simply need to be entertaining and avoid 
lawsuits.

-Adam

Bob Axtell wrote:

> "mythbusters" is entertainment. Their "tests" are not double-blind nor 
> are
> they capable of being repeated. Its preudoscience, similar to the 
> study of
> UFOs, Bermuda triangle and such.
>
> --Bob
>
> Robin.Bussell@axa-sunlife.co.uk wrote:
>
>>> Then they started to get stupid using angle grinders and like devices
>>> with disable safety features and vast overvoltages
>>>   
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist