John J. McDonough <piclist@mit.edu> wrote:

> The only time memory reserved by a res directive will be re-used
> for another variable is when the res directive is in the context of
> a udata_ovr, where you are declaring your intention that it be
> re-used, and have control over how.

    Right.  As I said, RES-named memory is protected from reuse by
    other RES directives. 

    My point, though, was that the memory can always be reused by
    either careless or deliberate use of EQU or CBLOCK... So RES
    affords no more protection than CBLOCK.

    -Andy

=== Andrew Warren -- aiw@cypress.com
=== Principal Design Engineer
=== Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
=== (but open to offers)
=== 
=== Opinions expressed above do not
=== necessarily represent those of
=== Cypress Semiconductor Corporation

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist